<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Battle Road Research Blog &#187; NOK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.battleroadblog.com/tag/nok/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index January 29 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/01/29/tech-index-january-29-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/01/29/tech-index-january-29-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ fell 1.7 percent for the week ended January 29, 2010, closing at 1549. For the week, 21 of the 25 Index components fell in value. Year-to-date, the index is down 7.8 percent, having started at a value of 1680. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Shares of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/01/29/tech-index-january-29-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index October 2 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/10/02/tech-index-october-2-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/10/02/tech-index-october-2-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIMM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ fell 1.7 percent for the week ended October 2, 2009, closing at 1474. For the week, 21 of the 25 Index components declined in value. Year-to-date, the index is up 47 percent, having started at a value of 1000. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Nokia (NYSE: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/10/02/tech-index-october-2-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index August 28 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/08/28/tech-index-august-28-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/08/28/tech-index-august-28-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DELL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ rose 0.8 percent for the week ended August 28, 2009, closing at 1461. For the week, 13 of the 25 Index components were in positive territory. Year-to-date, the index is up 46 percent, having started at a value of 1000. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Nokia [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/08/28/tech-index-august-28-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/17/163/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/17/163/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ rose nine percent for the week ended July 17, 2009, closing at 1359. For the week, 23 of the 25 Index components were in positive territory. Year-to-date, the index is up 36 percent, having started at a value of 1000. The following is our summary and commentary for the week: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/17/163/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index July 2 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/02/tech-index-july-2-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/02/tech-index-july-2-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BKS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YHOO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ dropped 2.4 percent for the week ended July 2, 2009, closing at 1276. For the week, 22 of the 25 Index components were in negative territory. Year-to-date, the index is up 27.6 percent, having started at a value of 1000. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Intel [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/02/tech-index-july-2-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index April 17 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/04/17/tech-index-april-17-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/04/17/tech-index-april-17-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMKT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIMM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ rose 1.4 percent for the week ended April 17, 2009, closing at 1216. Year-to-date, the index is up 21.6 percent, having started at a value of 1000. For the week, 13 of the 25 Index components were in positive territory. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Nokia [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/04/17/tech-index-april-17-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
