<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Battle Road Research Blog &#187; NFLX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.battleroadblog.com/tag/nflx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:01:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index August 13 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/08/13/tech-index-august-13-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/08/13/tech-index-august-13-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AKAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ fell 1.9 percent for the week ended August 13, 2010, closing at 1668. For the week, 19 of the 25 index components declined in value. Year-to-date, the index is down 0.7 percent, having started at a value of 1680. Netflix (NFLX), Akamai (AKAM), Hewlett Packard (HPQ), and Cisco (CSCO) were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/08/13/tech-index-august-13-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index January 29 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/01/29/tech-index-january-29-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/01/29/tech-index-january-29-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ fell 1.7 percent for the week ended January 29, 2010, closing at 1549. For the week, 21 of the 25 Index components fell in value. Year-to-date, the index is down 7.8 percent, having started at a value of 1680. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Shares of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/01/29/tech-index-january-29-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index September 18 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/09/18/tech-index-september-18-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/09/18/tech-index-september-18-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YHOO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ rose 2.3 percent for the week ended September 18, 2009, closing at 1539. For the week, 19 of the 25 Index components rose in value. Year-to-date, the index is up 54 percent, having started at a value of 1000. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Yahoo! (NASDAQ: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/09/18/tech-index-september-18-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index July 31 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/31/tech-index-july-31-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/31/tech-index-july-31-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AKAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YHOO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ fell 0.5 percent for the week ended July 31, 2009, closing at 1398. For the week, 13 of the 25 Index components were in negative territory. Year-to-date, the index is up 39.8 percent, having started at a value of 1000. Stocks for the most part consolidated gains achieved in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/31/tech-index-july-31-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index June 19 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/19/tech-index-june-19-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/19/tech-index-june-19-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AKAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YHOO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ lost 1.9 percent for the week ended June 19, 2009, closing at 1304. For the week, 19 of the 25 Index components were in negative territory. Year-to-date, the index is up 30.4 percent, having started at a value of 1000. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Research [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/19/tech-index-june-19-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index April 24 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/04/24/tech-index-april-24-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/04/24/tech-index-april-24-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ continues its streak of gains for a seventh straight week, rising 0.25 percent for the week ended April 24, 2009, closing at 1219. Year-to-date, the index is up 21.9 percent, having started at a value of 1000. For the week, 12 of the 25 Index components were in positive territory. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/04/24/tech-index-april-24-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
