<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Battle Road Research Blog &#187; AMZN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.battleroadblog.com/tag/amzn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index January 29 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/01/29/tech-index-january-29-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/01/29/tech-index-january-29-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ fell 1.7 percent for the week ended January 29, 2010, closing at 1549. For the week, 21 of the 25 Index components fell in value. Year-to-date, the index is down 7.8 percent, having started at a value of 1680. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Shares of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2010/01/29/tech-index-january-29-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index December 4 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/12/04/tech-index-december-4-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/12/04/tech-index-december-4-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AKAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TXN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ rose 1.7 percent for the week ended December 4, 2009, closing at 1617. For the week, 19 of the 25 Index components appreciated in value. Year-to-date, the index is up 62 percent, having started at a value of 1000. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Shares of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/12/04/tech-index-december-4-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index November 6 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/11/06/tech-index-november-6-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/11/06/tech-index-november-6-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ rose 3.6 percent for the week ended November 6, 2009, closing at 1561. For the week, only three of the 25 Index components fell in value. Year-to-date, the index is up 56 percent, having started at a value of 1000. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Shares [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/11/06/tech-index-november-6-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index July 2 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/02/tech-index-july-2-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/02/tech-index-july-2-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BKS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YHOO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ dropped 2.4 percent for the week ended July 2, 2009, closing at 1276. For the week, 22 of the 25 Index components were in negative territory. Year-to-date, the index is up 27.6 percent, having started at a value of 1000. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Intel [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/07/02/tech-index-july-2-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle Road Tech Index June 12 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/12/battle-road-tech-index-june-12-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/12/battle-road-tech-index-june-12-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DELL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PALM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIMM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ eked out a gain of 1.2 percent for the week ended June 12, 2009, closing at 1330. Year-to-date, the index is up 33 percent, having started at a value of 1000. For the week, 18 of the 25 Index components were in positive territory. The following companies were notable movers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/12/battle-road-tech-index-june-12-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Evolving eBook Reader Landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/12/the-evolving-ebook-reader-landscape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/12/the-evolving-ebook-reader-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Battle of the Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very little attention was paid to last week’s acquisition of E Ink by Prime View International. E Ink, based in Cambridge, MA, develops display technology that is used in both the Amazon Kindle and Sony ebook readers. The company was acquired by Prime View International, a Taiwanese company that makes both products. In doing so, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/12/the-evolving-ebook-reader-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index June 5 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/05/tech-index-june-5-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/05/tech-index-june-5-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDUP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ climbed 3.4 percent for the week ended June 5, 2009, closing at 1314. Year-to-date, the index is up 31 percent, having started at a value of 1000. For the week, 18 of the 25 Index components were in positive territory. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Amazon.com [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/06/05/tech-index-june-5-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index May 15 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/05/15/tech-index-may-15-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/05/15/tech-index-may-15-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ fell 2.0 percent for the week ended May 15, 2009, closing at 1210. Year-to-date, the index is up 21.0 percent, having started at a value of 1000. For the week, 19 of the 25 Index components were in negative territory. The following companies were notable movers for the week: Shares [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/05/15/tech-index-may-15-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index May 1 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/05/01/tech-index-may-1-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/05/01/tech-index-may-1-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AKAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WDC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ continues its streak of gains for an eighth straight week, rising 2.3 percent for the week ended May 1, 2009, closing at 1247. Year-to-date, the index is up 24.7 percent, having started at a value of 1000. For the week, 18 of the 25 Index components were in positive territory. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/05/01/tech-index-may-1-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Index April 24 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/04/24/tech-index-april-24-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/04/24/tech-index-april-24-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battleroadblog.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle Road Tech Index™ continues its streak of gains for a seventh straight week, rising 0.25 percent for the week ended April 24, 2009, closing at 1219. Year-to-date, the index is up 21.9 percent, having started at a value of 1000. For the week, 12 of the 25 Index components were in positive territory. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.battleroadblog.com/2009/04/24/tech-index-april-24-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
